Web Access

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Web Access. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Web Access paper right on time. Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Web Access, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Web Access paper at affordable prices!

On March 5th 00,The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments challenging the Childrens Internet Protection Act (CIPA). The law requires public schools and libraries to install Internet filters on their computers so children and adults cannot view inappropriate information on the Internet. Schools and libraries that fail to install filters stand to lose federal E-rate funding for Internet access. The Justice Department contends that CIPA gives local communities the alternative to set their filtering software at varying levels. Government attorneys also dispute that schools and libraries are not necessary to install the software; as an alternative, they could choose not to receive federal funds. Opponents, as well as the American Library Association and the American Civil Liberties Union, quarrel that filters are a flawed tool that restricts the rights of students and adults to view First Amendment-protected information.

The author gives two views into the argument, and lets the reader decided a stance on this issue. The first view is that of Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson. Olson takes the issue in defense of the Children's Internet Protection Act, stating ''when libraries block Internet pornography from computer terminals, they are simply refusing to put on their computer screens the same material they do not put on their shelves. Olson feels that as libraries have banned books from shelves in that past, they are also entitled the right to ban certain web sites that may share the same content. In offense to the Children's Internet Protection Act, Paul M. Smith feels the act is against First Amendment rights. Smith, who has been on behalf of the American Library Association and the American Civil Liberties Union since this bill was first signed in 000, has a different view to library filtering then Olson. Smith sees the Internet not as a library "bookshelf", yet as a "public forum". As a public forum smith feels that to require libraries to refuse the right to use the Internet would be the end of the public forum doctrine,'' Therefore, under the Supreme Courts First Amendment precedents, the government may not limit speech in a "public forum" lacking an interest and a policy narrowly modified to serve that interest. The issue currently under debate is whether to consider the Internet as a mere old-fashioned library bookshelf or a public forum?

Currently the government distributes more than $00 million a year in grants and subsidies that give public libraries "discounted Internet access". Mr. Olson argues that if a certain library felt that the bill was a violation of there rights they could decline filtering the Internet, yet loose federal funding. Over the past six years, Congress has made many attempts to control porn on the Internet. The result is a confusing collection of laws that, at least in theory, protect children from material that some communities consider unsuitable. My view on this issue is merely that of Mr. Olson. I feel that if the library has the right to regulate books on shelves, they should also have the right to regulate Internet usage. I see the library not as a public forum; therefore I feel it does not violate First Amendment rights. If per say a certain community did feel it violates there rights, under any circumstance they have the choice not to participate in the filtering law, yet will be subject to loose federal funding. Ultimately I feel the choice lies in the residents of communities around the country.

Please note that this sample paper on Web Access is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Web Access, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Web Access will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!