Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet'

|

If you order your cheap essays from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet'. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet' paper right on time. Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet', therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet' paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service! 'Romeo and Juliet' is a play that shows true love conquering hate. Shakespeare's tragic drama of the 'star-crossed' young lovers is seen to be an extraordinary work and was probably written in about 154 or 155. During much of the twentieth century, critics tended to disparage this play in comparison to the four great tragedies that Shakespeare wrote in the first decade of the seventeenth century ('Hamlet', 'King Lear', 'Macbeth', and 'Othello'). Appraised next to Shakespeare's mature works, 'Romeo and Juliet' appears to lack the psychological depth and the structural complexity of Shakespeares later tragedies. But over the past three decades or so, many scholars have altered this assessment, effectively upgrading its status within Shakespeares canon.


The play opens with a prologue spoken by a Chorus in the form of a fourteen-line sonnet. This is appropriate because it is a very structured play about love, and sonnets represent love. In this concise manner, we are told from the start that the plays setting is the Italian city of Verona, that a blood feud between two families (Montagues and Capulets) is the context in which the star-crossed lovers (Romeo and Juliet) will fall in love, and that only with


their deaths will this conflict come to an end.


The first scene is a contrast to the prologue because it involves fighting and sexual innuendoes. Officers break up the fight, and the Prince, representing law and order threatens to kill "if ever you disturb our streets again". In Act 1, Scene 5 Romeo meets Juliet for the first time and they fall in love. This leads to Romeo sneaking out in the middle of the night and going to visit Juliet at her house. In Act , Scene we are introduced to Friar Lawrence who agrees to marry Romeo and Juliet, thinking that by doing this it may end the feud, but it does not. The wedding is not actually shown because the pace of the play needs to be kept, but also to remind the audience that it is not the marriage that leads to death, but the love between Romeo and Juliet. In Act , Scene 1 Tybalt kills Mercutio, and in turn is killed by Romeo, which leads to his banishment. When Juliet finds out about Romeo's banishment she is devastated, and in Act 4, Scene 1 she threatens to kill herself. Friar Lawrence stops her because he has come up with a plan. He will give Juliet a potion that will make her seem to be dead, and she will be taken to a tomb. However the plan goes wrong, and Romeo thinks Juliet is actually dead, as he did not receive a letter written by Friar Lawrence. He ends up taking an apothecary's potion so that he can be with Juliet. Juliet then awakes, finding out that Romeo is dead and stabs herself with a dagger so that they can finally be together. It is only the death of these two young lovers that enables the feud to end.


Help with essay on Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet'


'Romeo and Juliet' is a play where love and hate are the main themes. Love is presented in many different forms - sexual love, courtly love, dutiful love and familial love, which all contrast the most important type of love, the true love between Romeo and Juliet. In 'Romeo and Juliet' love is a violent, ecstatic, overpowering force that supersedes all other values, loyalties, and emotions. Hate is shown between the two houses, the Capulets and the Montagues. This hate leads to conflict and causes many deaths. Death is often associated with the image of a lover.


In the opening lines of the play the love - hatred theme is presented at a bestial level by the heartless hinds. Hatred is stimulated to fighting by an obsence gesture,


"I will bite my thumb at them",


And loving is mere rape,


"Ay, the heads of the maids or their maidenheads - take it in what sense thou wilt".


Sexual love is shown through the bestial behaviour of the servants - they will take the maids' virginity, or cut off their heads. Throughout the play the audience will realise that sexual love affects everyone - the upper class but also the working class.


The use of puns was very common in the Elizabethan times. Sexual punning begins in lines 5-5 and continues throughout the play, used mainly by the Nurse and Mercutio. The love of Romeo and Juliet, although idealised, is rooted in passionate sexuality. The Victorian ideal of 'pure', non-sexual romantic love has not yet evolved. In this play there are crude allusions to sex and exalted ones, but the erotic is never very far under the surface.


The Nurse, who is one of Shakespeare's most memorable characters, is introduced in Act 1, Scene . She is a bawdy old lady who revels in sex and sympathises with young lovers. Her very first words are about sex, referring to the fact that the last time she was a virgin she was twelve,


"Now by my maidenhood - at twelve year old".


Her final line also suggests that the main joy of marriage is to be found in lovemaking, "women grow by men". This emphasises the physical act of love, and forms a contrast to the idealised love of Romeo and Juliet and formality of Paris' love. The Nurse is a very talkative, caring woman who throughout the play helps to develop the theme of sexual love. She is melodramatic and has a coarse sense of humour, but unlike Sampson she is not offensive.


In Act , Scene 1 Mercutio believes that Romeo is with Rosaline, although he is really with Juliet. The significance of Romeo's hiding and of Mercutio's vain conjuring is to emphasise that Romeo has renounced his conventional love of Act 1. He has no interest in Mercutio's bawdiness, and so appears as it were cleansed of unrealities and superficialities for the purity of the next scene. In Mercutio's next speeches to Benvolio he is very bawdy,


"'twoud anger him / To raise a spirit in his mistress' circle ... Till she had laid it and conjured it down"


Mercutio has a cynical view of love and believes that women are good for one thing only and along with the Nurse he provides entertainment and adds humour to the play using sexual love.


Mercutio and Benvolio cannot find Romeo in Act , Scene 4,


"Where the devil should this Romeo be?"


Mercutio automatically assumes that Romeo has spent the night with Rosaline, and that he has been worn out sexually. After this the references to sexual love become fewer because the play revolves around the love between Romeo and Juliet, showing it is pure. There is no more humour, which was linked to sexual love, as the play becomes serious, and revolves around Romeo and Juliet's love . Sexual love forms a contrast between the love of Romeo and Juliet showing their feelings are honest and their love is true.


At the beginning of the play Montagues description of Romeos melancholy fits the contemporary ideas of lovesickness, contrasting Romeos mooning over Rosaline with the fresh, spontaneous passion, which Juliet will inspire in him. Romeo is not involved in the hatred at the start of the play, his love is too incomplete and sterile. When he first enters he is behaving in the manner of a courtly lover,


"Out of her favour where I am in love."


The language he uses in this scene represents his feeling of unrequited love. He represents a typical, Elizabethan courtly lover. Romeo appears downcast and distracted, but he nevertheless speaks in highly figurative language about the brawl, using oxymorons like "loving hate", "heavy lightness" and "serious vanity". The many oxymorons in Romeos speech are clich�s, meant to evoke his callow, stereotypical attitude toward love. These oxymorons are compared to the religious sonnets shared between Romeo and Juliet to show that this courtly love Romeo feels is superfluous.


Romeo and Benvolio have a long discussion of love, during which we find that Romeo is in love just exactly as the culture of the day said a young man was supposed to be in love. In the popular love poetry of Shakespeares time, the focus is always on the sufferings of the male lover. The lady is beautiful, and her beauty strikes a man through the eyes, into the heart, making him fall in love. He suffers and tries to tell the lady of his suffering, so she may pity him and return his love. However she cruelly rejects his advances, and so he suffers some more, both from the fire of love and the coldness of her heart.


Benvolio tries to counsel Romeo with a series of proverbs grouped for effectiveness at the sestet of a sonnet,


"One man is lessened by another's anguish ... And the rank poison of the old will die."


He tries to cure Romeos love - sickness by persuading him to take a look at someone other than Rosaline. He tells Romeo that the cure for his current love - sickness is a new love - sickness. Later on in the scene Benvolio uses bird imagery,


"And I will make thee think thy swan a crow."


Rosaline is described as a crow in contrast to Juliet who is described as a "snowy dove". Light imagery is also used, but in a different context to the light used with Juliet. When Romeo sees Juliet he uses positive images - brightness of fire, compared to the "hot" fire of Rosaline who has burnt Romeo painfully.


In Act 1, Scene 4 Benvolio says,


"we'll have no Cupid hoodwinked with a scarf."


Cupid was traditionally depicted as blindfolded. This perhaps suggests that the old love for Rosaline represented by cupid is ending. Romeo still thinks he loves Rosaline, and is looking forward to seeing her at the feast, but is mocked by Mercutio who doesn't believe in true love,


"And to sink in it should you burden love; / Too great oppression for a tender thing."


Romeo's last speech before entering the Capulet's house is foreshadowing,


"By some vile forfeit of untimely death. / But he that hath the steerage of my course"


He foreshadows to perhaps remind the audience of the tragedy to come and that Romeo's 'love' for Rosaline is not real. Shakespeare has personified fate to make it sound more dramatic and to create tension. Sea imagery, "steerage of course" has been used to show that the natural force is often unpredictable.


When Romeo sees Juliet for the first time he feels true love,


"Did my heart love till now? Forswear it sight, / For I ne'er saw true beauty till this night."


Romeo equates looking with loving, as Lady Capulet did when she spoke to Juliet about Paris. The rhyming couplet emphasises that Rosaline is totally forgotten, and makes the audience aware that his love for Juliet is totally different. Romeo's character develops from this scene onwards. At the beginning of the play he was suffering courtly love from Rosaline, but at the end he feels true love towards Juliet.


The audience might also feel that Paris suffers from courtly love. His love for Juliet starts off as formal love and he admires her from afar, but as the play goes on the audience will know that Juliet never plans to marry Paris, and never has, or never will love him. Paris did really love Juliet as he goes to Juliets tomb when she 'dies' to glimpse her beauty once more. Romeo warns Paris to leave, but Paris ignores the warning,


"I do defy thy conjuration, / And apprehend thee for a felon here."


It shows Paris' love for Juliet because he is willing to be killed so Romeo can't get past, and in the end Paris does end up getting killed by Romeo.


Paris is a man who plays by the book. His love for Juliet is dutiful not true,


"But now my Lord, what say you to my suit?"


Paris approaches Capulet and asks him for Juliet's hand in marriage. This shows how he wants to do everything right, and contrasts Romeo's love for Juliet, as they decide to get married on the spur of the moment. Capulet however is sceptical, saying Juliet is too young and that he shall have to 'woo' her, as he wants Juliet to be happy in the match.


Paris doesn't appear in the play again until Act , Scene 4. Once again he is talking to Capulet, and not Juliet. He has not yet actually come into contact with Juliet, but feels that he is right for her. Credit must be given to him for acting in a much more proper fashion than Romeo, but the audience will feel that he is getting in the way of Romeo and Juliet's true love.


Act 4, scene 1 sees Paris and Juliet meet for the first time, but their conversation is very limited,


"Come you make confess to this father?


To answer that, I should confess to you.


Do not deny to him that you love me.


If I do so, it will be of more price, / Being spoke behind your back, than to your face".


Their short sentences suggest that they do not have much in common, and do not really know what to say to each other. Their conversation is very formal and lacks passion, which is the opposite of Romeo and Juliet's conversations, which are full of passion and love. Paris sees Juliet as a possession, and not for what she really is,


"Thy face is mine, and thou hast slandered it".


Paris does not feel true love for Juliet, as he acts wooden and formal when he is with her, "this holy kiss". This once again contrasts Romeo and Juliet's love, showing the audience how passionate they are, and how Paris' love is just dutiful.


Throughout the play the audience can see how Juliet's character changes and matures. At the beginning of the play Lady Capulet tells Juliet that "The valiant Paris seeks you for his love". Juliet says nothing, perhaps because the Nurse does not give her a chance. The Nurse sputters and searches for the words to say how handsome Paris is, then exclaims, "why he's a man of wax". In other words, he is as perfect as a wax sculpture. Lady Capulet also praises Paris as the most perfect flower of Verona, then asks Juliet if she can love him. Both Lady Capulet and the Nurse believe that Juliet should marry for duty - money and possession, as Lady Capulet did, and not love. Juliet being dutiful towards her mother says, "I'll look to like, if looking liking move". Juliet acts as the obedient daughter, and will do exactly what her mum asks. However this obedient character of Juliet changes in Act , Scene 5 when she refuses to agree to marry Paris.


"He shall not make me there a joyful bride."


She disobeys her mother's commands, and has now become the disobedient Juliet. The more independent that Juliet is becoming, the less she is the "hopeful lady of my earth".


Family love is one of the main themes in 'Romeo and Juliet', but in the end it is rejected for true love. After the street brawl of the opening scene, Benvolio stays behind to talk with Romeos parents. Lady Montague shows a motherly concern for her son,


"O where is Romeo? Saw you him today? / Right glad I am he was not at this fray."


She is glad that Romeo was not involved in the fight, which shows that she cares for him. This motherly love is reinforced later on in the play when Lady Montague actually dies from grief. It was believed that sudden violent grief would bring about death for the sudden rush of blood to the heart strangled it. Montague is also worried about his son, and thinks that he should not be alone, for he is in melancholy. Romeo has not told anyone what is wrong, so that he is like "the bud bit with an envious worm, / Ere he can spread his sweet leaves to the air, / Or dedicate his beauty to the sun."


Montague is comparing his son to a flower bud being eaten away from the inside by a worm, so that he will be ruined before he has a chance to bloom. Nowadays such high flown language is not used, but we have the same kind of worries as Montague; any father would be worried to see his beautiful child eaten alive by depression. In Act , Scene Montague's love for Romeo is shown, as he persuades the Prince not to execute him. Romeo's love towards his father is returned in Act 5, Scene 1, when he asks Balthasar how his father is.


The Capulets are not as close to Juliet as the Montagues are to Romeo, however in Act 1, Scene Capulet is portrayed as a loving father. When Paris asks him for Juliet's hand in marriage he replies saying she is too young, but Paris does not agree. Capulet doesn't want Juliet to make the same mistake that he did of marrying too young, which shows that he thinks of her as his young, innocent girl whom he wants to protect and love. Capulet asks for a little understanding, saying,


"Earth hath swallowed all my hopes but she, / She is the hopeful lady of my earth".


In plain terms, Juliet is Capulets only living child and his heiress, but the phrase "hopeful lady of my earth" also means that she is the hope around which his world turns. Nevertheless, he urges Paris to woo Juliet and says, "My will to her consent is but a part", which means that even if he agrees to the marriage, Juliet has the final say. The audience will feel that he is doing the right thing by Juliet, and being a good father, but later on in the play he has a drastic change of heart about this issue.


In the scene following Paris' proposal Lady Capulet wishes to speak with Juliet. The Nurse, when calling for Juliet uses nicknames, "What Lamb! What Lady-bird!" Thus we see the contrast between Juliets relationship with her nurse and her relationship with her mother. The Nurse is the one who calls Juliet nicknames; Lady Capulet is the one whom Juliet addresses as "madam". As the scene progresses, this contrast is heightened. Lady Capulet thinks Juliet is old enough to get married, and wants Juliet to seriously consider Paris proposal; the Nurse will be happy to see Juliet happily married, but what she really likes to talk about is how cute Juliet was when she was a baby. Its as though Juliet has two mothers, one who adores her no matter what she does, and one who wants her to grow up and do something with her life.


In the evening of the day of Juliets marriage to Romeo, Capulet explains to Paris that he has not had a chance to speak to Juliet about marrying. Then Capulet adds,


"Look you, she loved her kinsman Tybalt dearly".


This seems to suggest that Capulet has some sensitivity about her feelings. But within a few moments he offers Paris Juliets hand in marriage, saying,


"Sir Paris, I will make a desperate tender / Of my child's love. I think she will be ruled / In all respects by me; nay more, I doubt it not."


Capulets offer of Juliets love is "desperate" in the sense of "bold" because he has made the offer without knowing how Juliet feels about Paris. But the more common meaning of "desperate" is "reckless" or "thoughtless", and it certainly seems that Capulet didnt think before he spoke. However, once Capulet makes the offer he quickly becomes quite sure that he can follow through. He first thinks that Juliet will obey him, then he has no doubt that she will. Capulet thinks that because Juliet is his daughter he can control her.


The audience is shown in Act , Scene 5 how distant the Capulet family has become. Capulet believes that Juliet should marry Paris, and threatens to disown her when she disobeys. Like most parents, they want what is best for Juliet, and like many parents they think they know her so well that they know what is best for her better than she does. The family started splitting up after Romeo and Juliet got married, and only cared for each other. Juliet has slowly isolated herself from her family, and all that she has left to fall back on is Romeo. When Juliets parents think she is dead they are grief-stricken. Although Capulet had threatened to put her out on the street to starve and Lady Capulet had declared she was done with her, now that Juliet is (apparently) dead, they both say that all their happiness depended on her.


Friar Lawrence and the Nurse act as surrogate parents to Romeo and Juliet. When Romeo comes to see Friar Lawrence he is addressed as "son", and Romeo calls the Friar "father", which is appropriate because of the Friars status as a priest; however, the two of them also seem to have a secular father - son relationship. During their conversation the Friar says, "Our Romeo hath not been in bed tonight". The use of the word "our" suggests that the Friar considers Romeo to be part of his family, and the fact that the Friar guesses the truth about Romeo suggests that he knows him quite well. These impressions are strengthened as the scene unfolds, for when the Friar learns of Romeos love for Juliet, he immediately starts chiding the young man about Rosaline. As the Friar talks about how Romeo has wept and sighed for Rosaline, we see that Romeo has confided in him more than he has in his parents or his friend Benvolio. Also, the Friars chiding is a half-joking way of expressing his concern that Romeo has simply traded one hopeless infatuation for another.


After Romeo kills Tybalt, he hides in Friar Lawrences cell. The Friar acts as a counsellor and says the sort of things that parents would say - that Romeo should grow up, that Romeo should realise how lucky he is, that Romeo should think about all he has to live for - but none of this seems to reach Romeo. The Friar then tells Romeo what to do when knocking is heard, like a parent would. These stage directions and the punctuation used by the Friar in this scene creates tension. The Friar's love for Romeo is ironic, as the more he does to help him, the more trouble that he causes for him and Juliet. Throughout the play the Friar wants to do right, but through his ideas that he thought were harmless he helps to cause the tragedy.


The Nurse, talking with Romeo in Act , Scene 4 about his arrangements for the wedding between himself and Juliet, expresses parental worry that Romeo might be trying to take advantage of Juliets youthful innocence,


"the gentlewoman is young, and therefore if you should deal double with her, truly it were an ill thing to be offered to any gentlewoman, and very weak dealing."


However, when she is sure that Romeo really does intend marriage, the Nurse is very happy showing that she loves Juliet like a daughter. Throughout the play the Nurse and Juliet have been very close, as apart from the Friar she was the only one to know about her and Romeo's wedding. However at the end of the play the audience will feel that their close relationship has changed, as Juliet does not confide in the Nurse of the plan.


Family love is also shown between friends, especially Romeo and Benvolio. Benvolio listens, comforts and gives advice to Romeo when he is down,


"By giving liberty unto thy eyes. / Examine other beauties."


He tells Romeo to look at other women and stop wallowing in self-pity. This is typical of Benvolio, as he is a man who does not believe in true love. After Romeo has killed Tybalt Benvolio says, "Romeo away, be gone" showing that he cares for Romeo and does not want anything bad to happen to him.


Love in 'Romeo and Juliet' is a grand passion, and as such it is blinding, it can overwhelm a person as powerfully and completely as hate can. The passionate love between Romeo and Juliet is linked from the moment of its interception with death. Tybalt has noticed that Romeo has crashed the feast and determines to kill him, just as Romeo catches sight of Juliet and falls instantly in love with her. From that point on love seems to push the two lovers closer to love and violence, not further from it.


True love is first shown in Act 1, Scene 5. When Romeo first sees Juliet he falls instantly in love with her, jettisoning his love for Rosaline. On first seeing Juliet, Romeo describes her beauty in terms of dark and light,


"She doth teach the torches to burn bright"


He means that her beauty is brighter than the blaze of any torch and that her presence makes the whole room light up. The bright blaze of Juliet's beauty is made even brighter by the contrasts with the blackness of an "Ethiope" and the blackness of crows.


In the Elizabethan times it was believed that true love always struck at first sight; love that grew gradually was no love at all. Romeo's first words to Juliet are a sonnet quatrain in which he says that he is an unworthy pilgrim come to the shrine of Juliet's beauty. Juliet replies with a second sonnet quatrain, encouraging him in this vein. In a series of exchanges, the lovers jointly complete a 14-line sonnet and then kiss,


"Have not saint lips, and holy palmers too?


Ay Pilgrim lips that they must in prayer."


Love is being described in the terms of religion, which shows the depth and purity of their love, and later in the play it is described as a sort of magic. The love between Romeo and Juliet is reciprocated as they speak alternate lines that link them closely. The language used is a contrast to the type of language used by the servants, as it is pure love that is shown, not sexual. After Romeo and Juliet kiss Juliet says, "You kiss by th' book" meaning that he kisses according to the book, and implying that while proficient, his kissing lacks originality. In reference to Rosaline, it seems, Romeo loves by the book. Rosaline, of course, slips from Romeo's mind at first sight of Juliet, but Juliet is no mere replacement. The love she shares with Romeo is far deeper, more authentic and unique that the clich�d puppy love Romeo felt for Rosaline. Romeo's development is due to Juliet; her level-headed observations, such as the one about Romeo's kissing, seem just the thing to snap Romeo from his superficial idea of love, and to inspire him to speak some of the most beautiful and intense love poetry ever written. In the next part of the scene Romeo foreshadows by saying "Ay so I fear, the more is my unrest". He can't stop the way he feels about Juliet, it's too late - he is already in love with her. Juliet also uses foreboding and dramatic irony, "My grave is like to be my wedding-bed".


Act , Scene is seen as one of the most famous scenes in the play, and is known as the balcony scene. Here Romeo and Juliet meet for the second time. Thus the entire opening to this scene is devoted to Romeo's fevered desire that she will make love with him. Despite Romeo's passion, he is shy enough, and polite enough not to simply burst in upon her. It is the tension between his overwhelming desire and his reticence that shows how much he truly loves her. Romeo's first speech to Juliet is full of light imagery,


"He jests at scars that never felt a wound ... And none but fools do wear it; cast it off".


Though it is late at night, Juliet's surpassing beauty makes Romeo think that she is the sun, transforming the darkness into daylight. Romeo likewise personifies the moon calling it "sick and pale with grief" at the fact that Juliet, the sun, is far brighter and more beautiful. Romeo then compares Juliet to the stars, claiming that she eclipses the stars as daylight overpowers a lamp - her eyes alone shine so bright that they will convince the birds to sing at night as if it were day. This quote is important because in addition to initiating one of the plays most beautiful and famous sequences of poetry, it is a prime example of the light/dark motif that runs throughout the play. Many scenes in 'Romeo and Juliet' are set either late at night or early in the morning, and Shakespeare often uses the contrast between night and day to explore opposing alternatives in a given situation. Through Romeo's speech the audience will feel the purity of love between Romeo and Juliet. He thinks that Juliet is perfect and full of beauty, and says nothing crude.


Juliet's second lines to Romeo are perhaps the most important in the play,


"O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo ... And I'll no longer be a Capulet".


Juliet, not realising that Romeo is below in the orchard asks why Romeo must be a Montague. Still unaware of Romeo's presence, she asks him to deny his family for her loves. She adds, however, that if he will not, she will deny her family in order to be with him if he merely tells her that he loves her. A major theme in 'Romeo and Juliet' is the tensions between social and family identity, and one's inner identity. Juliet believes that love stems from ones inner identity , and that the feud between the Montague's and the Capulet's is a product of the outer identity, banned only on names. She thinks of Romeo in individual terms, and thus her love for him overrides her family's hatred for the Montague name.


In this scene Romeo acts impulsively, while Juliet is practical and sensible. Romeo speaks romantically, which is different to how Juliet speaks. During this scene Romeo foreshadows,


"For stony limits cannot hold love out".


This is done by Shakespeare to remind the audience of what this love leads to. Romeo says that he would die for Juliet because he loves her so much,


"And but thou love me, let them find me here, / My life were better ended by their hate".


This shows the contrast between love and hate - a problem in their relationship.


Juliet's first long speech makes clear that she is still a virtuous young women who wishes her love had not been so promptly revealed, but now that it has been, she does not intend to look backwards. Much of the rest of her speech examines a paradox in traditional European attitudes toward love as they concerned women; a woman should fall instantly in love upon first seeing her beloved, but it was highly improper for her to reveal her feelings. Romeo's statement, "O wilt thou leave me so unsatisfied" is obviously startling to Juliet, but he quickly recovers by insisting that he will love her faithfully. Having once proclaimed her love, the font of Juliet's eloquence is unstopped, and she becomes the dominant figure in the rest of this scene. One of the most charming touches in this scene is Juliet being overwhelmed by Romeo's presence that she couldn't remember why she called him back. Bird imagery is often referred to by Shakespeare in 'Romeo and Juliet' and is used once again in this scene, "O for a falconer's voice". It is appropriate because the swiftness and flight soon becomes very important in the play. At the end of this scene the audience will know how strong the love between Romeo and Juliet is.


In Act , Scene 5 Juliet is anxious - she needs to know what Romeo has said to the Nurse. This shows that she is not quite sure if Romeo loves her as much as she loves him,


"Is three long hours, yet she is not come. / Had she affections and warm youthful blood, / She would be swift in motion as a ball".


Juliet feels that if the Nurse was young and had the love of Juliet then she would be quick with the answer. Shakespeare has formed a sense of urgency and tension through the style of the language. Juliet is very cunning. She tries to manipulate the Nurse - flatter her so that she'll tell Juliet the news, "Sweet, sweet, sweet Nurse". This shows signs of Juliet's maturity, which has grown due to her, and Romeo's love. When Juliet finds out that Romeo will marry her she exclaims "Hie to high fortune!" showing her happiness and excitement towards the marriage, which is the total opposite of how she feels when her father tells her that she must marry Paris.


Romeo's love for Juliet is reinforced in Act , Scene 6 when he is with the Friar,


"Then love-devouring death do what he dare".


He is saying let death do what it wants, as he has Juliet, ie. One minute with Juliet is worth dying for, which is a bit rational but obviously shows how strong his love is. Romeo and Juliet don't think, they follow their passion and not their heads. This excessive of passion will lead to the tragedy and passion must be controlled by reason.


At the Capulet house Juliet is unaware of the killings and speaks a soliloquy in which she implores the sun to set so that night can fall and she can elope with Romeo. In her speech Shakespeare has personified nature as it was seen as a strong and influential force in the Elizabethan times. Light and dark imagery is also used as it is throughout the play, as it has a strong link to the true love between Romeo and Juliet,


"Spread they close curtain, love - performing night, / That runaway's eyes may wink, and Romeo / Leap to these arms, untalked of and unseen".


Juliet is seeing things as though she is on a bed, seeing the curtains close about her, bringing the dark in which acts of love are performed. In the dark lovers will provide their own light because "lovers can see to do their amorous rites / By their own beauties". This idea, that beauty creates its own light, is the same one Romeo talked about when he saw Juliet on her balcony and described her as an angel shining in the night.


Tension is created in Act , Scene . The Nurse does not tell Juliet who is dead. Juliet, along with the audience may think that it is Romeo who is dead. The death creates dramatic tension, along with the short sentences. Juliet uses oxymorons that link her and Romeo closely, "a damned saint, an honourable villain". These oxymorons are used so Juliet can makes sense of what has happened. When finding out that it is Tybalt that has died and Romeo has been banished, Juliet focuses on Romeo, not Tybalt. She is more concerned with Romeo's banishment than Tybalt's death, showing her loyalty towards him. There is a development in Juliet's character, as her maturity grows when she realises that Romeo isn't what he seemed. He has two sides, positive and negative, "Beautiful tyrant". However Juliet chastises herself for saying these unkind remarks, and fixes upon the word "banishment", and says that she would rather ten thousand Tybalt's had died, than that her Romeo be banished. In this play death is very important, and here Romeo's love is personified as death.


In Act , Scene 5 there is a lot of reference to night and day, and the stars and the sun are personified representing true love. Night has become friendly and brings secrecy, while daylight is the enemy and brings danger. An aubade is used, a song/poem sang at dawn, usually by a parting lover. In Elizabethan times it was seen as a song of mourning - it heightens and intensifies emotions. This scene shows that Romeo and Juliet are deeply in love, but lament the turn of events that will force them to part.


Juliet has a very passionate speech in Act 4, Scene 1 where she says she'd rather die than marry Paris as she is in love with Romeo. She uses violent and wild images of death which mirror her strength of emotion and shows the strength of her love. Agreeing to take the potion shows her loyalty towards Romeo and how much she loves him. Before actually taking the potion Juliet has many doubts. She is scared and thinks that she will wake up in the tomb before Romeo gets there - this is ironic as she actually wakes up too late. The mention of the "bloody Tybalt" is to remind the audience of how Romeo and Juliet got to be in this desperate situation. Juliet's love for Romeo gives her courage to actually go through with taking the potion,


"Romeo! Romeo! Romeo! I drink to thee".


The repetition of "Romeo" shows Juliet's love. There is also a parallel between Romeo and Juliet as they both have doubts about the potion they're going to take, which links them closely. When Juliet wakes up and finds Romeo not with her she is devastated and wished that Romeo could have left some potion so that they could be together. So instead she takes Romeo's dagger and kills herself. This shows how strong her love for Romeo was as she is willing to go through pain to finally be with him.


Romeo goes to buy a potion from the apothecary so that he and Juliet can be together. He does not see it as death or bad, but sees it as good proving how strong his love for Juliet is. In Act 5, Scene Romeo says,


"Why I descend into this bed of death".


Death is personified as a lover. Throughout the play death and love seem to be linked very closely. Animal imagery is used, "than empty tigers" as in the Elizabethan times it was thought that animals acted on instinct and this is how Romeo acts. In Romeo's speech before he kills himself all his emotions are revealed,


"Death that hath sucked the honey of thy breath ... And death's pale flag is not advanced there".


This is ironic because death hasn't conquered her yet. Romeo dies saying that he loves Juliet and the audiences know how strong he felt for her.


We sense the grand irony that in death Romeo and Juliet have created the world that would have allowed their love to live. That irony does exist, and it is tragic. But because of the power and beauty of their love, it is hard to see Romeo and Juliets death as a simple tragedy. Romeo and Juliets deaths are tragic, but this tragedy was fated by the stars, by the violent world in which they live, by the play, and by their very natures. The audience, wanted this death, this tragedy. At the plays end, the audience do not feel sad for the loss of life as much as they feel wrenched by the incredible act of love that Romeo and Juliet have committed as monuments to each other and their love. Romeo and Juliet have been immortalised as the archetypes of true love not because their tragic deaths bury their parents strife, but rather because they are willing to sacrifice everything - including themselves - for their love. That Romeo and Juliet must kill themselves to preserve their love is tragic. That they do kill themselves to preserve their love makes them transcendent. At the end of the play all the other types of love - courtly, faithful, sexual and family have been examined and found wanting. They are ultimately discarded to leave the purest form of love - the true love between Romeo and Juliet.


Throughout the play the themes of death and violence permeate Romeo and Juliet, and they are always connected to passion, whether that passion is love or hate. There is an obvious relationship between hate, violence and death. There is also the clashing juxtaposition of love and hate in the play. The first scene is full of hate and fighting and is a contrast to the Prologue, which is full of love and fate. The hate between the two households is due to the 'ancient grudge', a feud that has existed for a very long time. It is actually unlikely that either household can remember what the feud is about.


Two servants from the Capulet house start a fight with two servants from the Montague house, "[They fight". Thus showing that the feud and hatred between the two families runs all the way through each house, the servants of the houses hate each other just as much as the heads do. The origin of the brawl, introduces the important theme of masculine honour. Masculine honour does not function in the play as some sort of stoic indifference to pain or insult. In Verona, a man must defend his honour whenever it is transgressed against, whether verbally or physically. This concept of masculine honour exists through every layer of society in Verona, from the servants on up to the noblemen. It animates Samson and Gregory as much as it does Tybalt. It is significant that the fight between the Montagues and Capulets erupts first among the servants. Readers of the play generally focus on the two great noble families, as they should. However one should not overlook Shakespeares inclusion of servants in the story the perspectives of servants in Romeo and Juliet are often used to comment on the actions of their masters, and therefore, society. However Benvolio, 'the peace - maker' tries to break up the fight, but when Tybalt, 'the manifestation of hate' enters he provokes Benvolio,


"I hate the word, / As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee"


showing pure hatred towards the Montagues, and causing another fight.


Tybalt is a man who loves to fight, as the first thing that he says when he finds out that Romeo is at the party is, "Fetch me my rapier boy". We know that he has an aggressive nature, but he pretends that he is doing it for the honour of his family,


"Now by the stock and honour of my kin",


But really all he wants to do is fight. This forms a contrast of love and hate, which causes tension. It reminds the audience of the conflict between the two houses, and shows that Romeo and Juliet's relationship is going to be hard. Capulet orders Tybalt not to fight, but Tybalts rage is set, creating the circumstances that will eventually banish Romeo from Verona. Tybalt threatens to turn the "seeming sweet" to "bitterest gall", thus causing tension, as when will Tybalt have his revenge?


Hate does not play an important role in the next act, as the act is more concentrated on the love of Romeo and Juliet. However the audience are reminded many times that hate is the main problem in the relationship, and is one of the causes of the final tragedy,


"For stony limits cannot hold love out", "I have been feasting with my enemy" and "then love - devouring death do what he dare" are such examples. The audience is also reminded of the feud as the Friar says,


"For this alliance may so happy prove, / To turn your households' rancour to pure love".


He thinks that by marrying Romeo and Juliet he will end the feud, but he is wrong.


The sudden, fatal violence in the first Scene of Act , as well as the build-up to the fighting, serves as a reminder that, for all its emphasis on love, beauty, and romance, 'Romeo and Juliet' still takes place in a highly masculine world in which notions of honour, pride, and status are prone to erupt in a fury of conflict. Benvolio feels that if they might the Capulet's there will be a fight,


"And if we meet, we shall not 'scape a brawl".


Heat leaves the character, short - tempered - Benvolio tries to diffuse a possible fight, "mad blood stirring". When Tybalt enters he and Mercutio have a verbal speech where they both suggest that they are willing to fight. However when Romeo enters Tybalt exclaims, "here comes my man", the man he wants to fight is Romeo. This could be because Mercutio is only a friend of the Montagues, while Romeo is actually part of the family whom Tybalt hates with all his heart. Tybalt's aggressive character and the fact that he loves to fight are reinforced as he provokes Romeo hoping that he will start a fight, "thou art a villain". Throughout the play Tybalt represents violence and hatred. Tybalt's strong emotion of hatred makes him end up killing Mercutio, and in turn getting killed himself. Tybalt was the man who showed the most hatred in the play, and was killed off because there was no longer a need for hatred, as it had already been established.


The themes of love and hate dominate 'Romeo and Juliet'. Each type of love is shown through different characters in the play, but either Romeo or Juliet are linked to them all. The Nurse and Mercutio represent sexual love with the use of sexual puns. Romeo and Juliet often refer to sexual love, and spend one night of passion with each other. However at the beginning of the play Romeo is suffering from courtly love, and believes he is truly in love with Rosaline. This love is immediately forgotten as soon as he sees Juliet. Paris feels dutiful love for Juliet. He sees her as his possession. Juliet also feels dutiful towards her parents at the beginning of the play, but this soon changes as she falls in love with Romeo. Family love is seen strongly through Romeo and his friends, but not so strongly between the two families. The main type of love in the play is the true love between Romeo and Juliet. They first fall in love at the Capulet's party and their love blossoms throughout the play, leading to both Romeo and Juliet killing themselves so that they can be together. The hate between the two houses is due to a feud that has existed for many years. This hate is entwined with true love throughout the play, and is the main cause of Romeo and Juliet's deaths.


Please note that this sample paper on Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet' is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet', we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom research papers on Discuss the themes of love and hate in 'Romeo and Juliet' will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Plato and Homer

|

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Plato and Homer. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Plato and Homer paper right on time. Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Plato and Homer, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Plato and Homer paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service! At the end of the Iliad Akhilleus has learned that all life is precious. The story of the Iliad is the story of his coming to realize this. When one is faced with death there is roughly a five-stage process of denial, bargaining, anger, depression and acceptance that one may go through but that few complete. At the conclusion of the Iliad he has gotten past denial, bargaining, anger and depression to understanding and acceptance that not just he but all men must die. He is still sad and angry, but these emotions are not ruling him, as they were earlier in his struggles. Akhilleus is a best-case scenario and his achieving this wisdom is a testament to his courage. It is an unfortunate fact that most mortals never achieve this; an example of one who failed is Socrates. In this paper I will compare and contrast Akhilleus and Socrates in an attempt to illuminate my thoughts on the main differences between the philosophies of Homer and Plato.


Socrates appears to accept his death sentence peacefully but he is actually, I feel, still in the denial, bargaining and anger phases. His ideas about the immortality of the soul and the imperfections of the flesh allow him to avoid the spiritual maturation that Akhilleus had to face and are actually a complex denial of the power of death. He unreservedly condemns all of life as imperfect and in a complete turn around from the ideas of the Iliad sees death as perfection and life as corruption. For Socrates life is becoming, death is being and the body is fettered distraction and with these ideas he is laying the groundwork for a pervasive undercurrent of guilt that comes from the conflict between the care of the body and the care of the soul which mirrors the conflict between honor and justice in the Iliad. He feels that one should not care for the body too much but only just enough to get it through to its appointed time of death. "So long as we are alive, it seems likely that we shall come nearest to having knowledge if we do our utmost to have no contact or association with the body except in so far as is absolutely necessary…"(Phaedo pg.75). This condemnation of life in favor of death seems to me to be based on anger and fear and by never moving past this, as Akhilleus did, he unnaturally arrests his spiritual development. Its as if Socrates and Akhilleus walk hand in hand to the brooding at the ships but then part ways as Akhilleus eventually moves on to live out his few remaining days while Socrates never leaves, eventually drinking his cup of poison in defiance of injustice.


Perhaps some of Socrates' anger stems from his being told that he is the wisest man on earth (according to the Oracle at Delphi) but few believe this. It's interesting to compare this to Akhilleus being the greatest warrior and everybody knowing it. Socrates also feels that a philosopher would make for the best ruler of the state but no one else seems to agree for there is no movement to elect him but instead much suspicion of him both in high and low stations. He says that men are unwise because they think the opposite while he is truly wise because he knows he's not but few of his day would agree with him on this point, which could cause Socrates some bitterness. His fear could stem from his advanced age and his realization that his days are numbered and may even be cut short by enemies in high places. Understanding that those he sees as inferiors to him hold the power to end his life or question his honor probably causes in Socrates some angry resentment. Like Akhilleus at the ships, truth and justice are his sword and shield but the indifferent universe takes no notice. Akhilleus accepts this universal indifference to justice while Socrates defies it to his own detriment.


All of Akhilleus' fears and anger must be faced directly, but Socrates can employ his philosophy to avoid direct confrontation with these emotions. Akhilleus does put off his development for awhile as he broods by his ships, and it's interesting to note the almost Socatical philosophizing that he does when Odysseus comes with the bribe offering from Agamemnon, only unlike Socrates he gives free, open and honest vent to his burning anger. Socrates on the other hand, uses his philosophy to rationalize and displace his anger so that on his surface he presents as a calm explorer of wisdom while underneath and hidden he roils with anger. Homer forces Akhilleus out of his fancies, but Socrates never escapes and instead sacrifices his life to these sublimated angers and honor based creative musings.


Do my essay on Plato and Homer CHEAP !


Socrates' relationship with the Athenian State and Akhilleus' relationship with Agamemnon are both representative of their respective relationships with their feelings about injustice or death, which is really the ultimate injustice. Authority like death is a power that one must wrestle with and is representative of death. Agamemnon is much like the Athenian State in that he is not perfect. Akhilleus is Agamemnon's gadfly especially when he is in his Socratic state, brooding by his ships and preaching in a questioning way to his companions who have come with the bribes. Akhilleus' extremism in matters of honor is much like Socrates' idealism in matters of wisdom and perfection, which can be seen as just sublimations of Socrates' extremism also in matters of honor. Akhilleus' peace with Agamemnon is representative of the peace he makes with death while Socrates' condemnation of the Athenian State is indicative of his unresolved issues with his own mortality.


To sum up all of the above, Agamemnon angers Akhilleus at the opening of the Iliad and for much of the book he is emotionally where Socrates stays and is when he drinks the poison; this is the state of anger, denial and bargaining in relation to death. But Akhilleus, unlike Socrates, continues to develop and finds deeper truths. By accepting death Akhilleus champions life while by condemning life Socrates champions death.


Socrates sees his trial as the trial of the Athenian State and all of Civilization. Life itself is on trial and condemned by Socrates when Athens fails to embrace wisdom but instead condemns him to death.


"And how are we to bury you?"


"Anyhow you like," he said, "if you can catch me, and I don't elude you."(Phaedo pg.10) Socrates knows he is not so easily gotten rid of and time has proved him right. With Socrates death all of life is cast into Tartarus and every year regurgitated along the river Cocytus past the Acherusian lake only life doesn't plead with Socrates because it still believes itself guilty and deserving of its punishment. And so Socrates' curse; the curse of western civilization, the curse of inescapable guilt, still lives in our collective heart. It can be under stood as if Akhilleus had cursed the Akhaians with defeat unending at the hands of the Trojans rather than just being pushed back to their ships and losing many brave men crowded into the undergloom. Or as if Akhilleus had condemned all of life to suffering eternal and only those that come to understand that they are wrong and he is right can be freed from this curse. Socrates' lasting curse is the curse of death and the belief that we are all guilty and corrupted. These ideas have grown and developed over time; they have been modified a bit but continue to thrive into the 0th century. In the universal battle of life against death it is death that has been holding the tide of war and I blame Socrates and Plato for contributing to its enduring power.


Socrates has decided that he shall never die but live in eternal bliss pleasantly pursuing the paths of wisdom with the Gods and the select few truly wise mortals that have gone before him. Akhilleus doesn't see it that way but sees his fate tied up with that of all mortals; with death comes the undergloom and one's soul is only a shade at best of what one was in life. "Let me hear no smooth talk of death from you, Odysseus, light of councils. Better I say, to break sod as a farm hand for some poor country man, on iron rations, than lord it over all the exhausted dead."(The Odyssey book 11 line 578-81) Socrates believes just the opposite; making life the gloom while death brings the light. In addition Socrates believes that unless men follow his example they shall forever be denied the purity of paradise and instead wallow in their own guilt laden imperfection, weighed down by the soul corrupting power of the flesh, always returning to the dismal hole of half truths and shades, which is his vision of this existence on Earth.


"…But if you neglect yourselves, and refuse to live following the track marked out, as it were, in our present and past discussions, then however much you may now undertake to do, and however earnestly, you will not be doing any good" (Phaedo pg.10) Akhilleus entertained, in a way, similar sorts of self centered, angry, destructive, unreasonable, and elitist visions also, for a while, as he sulked by his ships but eventually abandoned his anger and continued to grow.


Lifeless bodies are afforded great honors in Akhilleus' world because that's all that's left in the end while Socrates cares not what's done with his body because he fancies himself immortal; sees his future as immortal bliss spent among the gods; his body a curse and the end of his life a blessing. Socrates' vision of a life well lived is one spent in hopeful, expectant, anticipation of death! Socrates, like Akhilleus, for a while, asks the impossible of all men but unlike Akhilleus he never abandons his contention and goes to his death believing himself something greater than his collective parts and qualitatively better then most men living and dead but even worse than this admonishes all men that it would behoove them to do the same.


In the Iliad, men cry without shame, the tears flow in rivers, as can be seen with Akhilleus' many bouts with despair, but with Socrates emotion is made shameful because the body is corrupt and what one feels is inferior to what one understands. In the Iliad despair is not shameful but part of the honors one bestows on the dead, while In Phaedo those most likely to show this weakness of the flesh are sent away. In the Iliad, death is an atrocity, while Socrates has turned it into a call for celebration. In the Iliad, pain and despair are accepted as a part of life, along with pleasure and joy, but Socrates throws out the baby with the bath water, so to speak, by relegating all emotion to inferior shades of their original purity on the true earth. Our emotions in life are just becoming while true emotions that come only with death are the being. It follows logically in Socrates' worldview that it is foolish to make too much out of these inferior shades. This contributes to a world where despair is frowned upon and emotion and feeling of any kind can be dismissed as ignorance. Any thing one may feel in life is muddi8ed by the flesh and just an imperfect shade of what's to come with death if one peruses Socrates' vision of wisdom in life. Socrates' philosophical developments may be good for the machinery of society in the short run but in the end they are a death sentence for the heart of humanity.


The basic tenet that maintains humanity and all of life despite Socrates' efforts to claim otherwise is that life is desirable over death. If the opposite were true as Socrates claims, then life would not continue. Homer's first written record of Western Civilization got it right but in accomplishing this also laid the foundation for all the complexity of dreams and longings that have been penned and pined after and ever since. It's ironic that perhaps Homer helped make Socrates possible. For society to develop from the chaotic state of the warring tribes of Homer's world to the beginnings of the law and order of Socrates' Athens, all the way to our technologically advanced 0th century, truth had to give way for utility's sake to a wrath of complex, inconsistent, illogical and controlling lies. Socrates' previous quote warning men not to stray from the straight and narrow is laying the groundwork for a moral obligation to follow the law which lends itself well to the maintenance of order; but the spiritual impact of his grand vision of this life and the next is a deadening of the human spirit and a permanent guilt, based on human imperfection. The worst result is the embracing of death over life. It's the ultimate injustice handed to the human flame of consciousness that flickers only very briefly in this indifferent unknown and then is extinguished. What a monstrous mistake if, in the end, this little flicker of life is all we really have and Socrates' vision of a grand after is only a fantasy… What a crime for so many generations to have been indoctrinated with these false hopes and denied the ability to fully appreciate the one gift that is known to be real, life. Instead, taught that the one for sure true thing is actually a corruption. What if it just isn't so; what if we really don't live in a hollow in the earth but only painted it so in dark colors and what if by accepting Socrates' vision we are not freeing ourselves from the cave but chaining ourselves in it?


Should we give up life for the sake of order? Do we really want to be a beehive or an ant colony? Is comfort and security so important that we would abandon life and truth and accept injustice unflinchingly for it? Is the Chaos of a universe that is ultimately unfathomable really so abhorrent that we must invent a lie that robs all life of pleasure to explain it and foist this invention up as the universal good? Should we accept the ravings of a self-centered vindictive man who has sublimated his anger below a smooth veneer of philosophic inquiry, as an objective illumination of wisdom and virtue? The Iliad tells us that the answer to all these questions is no but the Dialogues of Plato say yes. Akhilleus in the end says no but Socrates unfalteringly and consistently says yes. Akhilleus chooses life while Socrates chooses death. Life is real and here now, for all of us breathing, while death is only conjecture and dreaming. It is said that dreams are wiser than men, but should one stake their brief life on it? What a waste to of spent your life with eyes fixed on the empty heavens while all around you washes the beautiful current of the only thing certainly real.


The above was my attempt to compare the two conflicting philosophies of Plato and Homer using their two main characters, Socrates and Akhilleus, as points of reference.


Please note that this sample paper on Plato and Homer is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Plato and Homer, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Plato and Homer will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Cultural Background

|

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Cultural Background. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Cultural Background paper right on time. Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Cultural Background, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Cultural Background paper at affordable prices!


For children to excel in a classroom, they must be valued there and share in the dialogue of learning. Delpit (1) encourages the participation of all voices in the classroom. This fosters greater understanding not only of the curricula but of various people and cultures as well. Taylor (187) offers educators a framework for becoming more insightful observers in multicultural settings


Differences between cultures are often perceived as threatening.


Feelings of apprehension, loneliness, or lack of confidence are common when visiting and experiencing another culture.


First-hand experience is the best way to understand the many subtleties of any culture.


What is logical and important in one culture may seem irrational and unimportant to another.


In describing another culture, people tend to stress differences and overlook similarities.


Stereotyping due to over-generalization may be inevitable among those who lack frequent contact with other cultures.


Personal observations of others about another culture should be regarded with skepticism.


All cultures have internal variations.


Cultural awareness varies within individuals.


Ones own sense of cultural identity often is not evident until one encounters another culture.


Cultures are continually evolving.


Understanding another culture is a continuous process.


One should understand the language of a culture to best understand that culture.Au, K. H. (1). Changes in teachers view of interactive comprehension instruction. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education Instructional implications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 71-86). New York Cambridge University Press.


Beyer, B. K. (11). Teaching thinking skills A handbook for elementary school teachers. Boston Allyn and Bacon.


Boggs, S. T., Watson-Gegeo, K., & McMillen, G. (185). Speaking, relating, and learning A study of Hawaiian children at home and at school. Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing Group.


Bower, B., Lobdell, J., & Swenson, L. (14). A new approach to teaching history in the diverse classroom. Teaching Thinking and Problem-Solving, 16(1), 7-14.


Brualdi, A C. (16). Multiple intelligences Gardners theory. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available http//www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed4106.html


Cazden, C. B., John, V. P., & Hymes, D. H. (Eds.). (185). Functions of language in the classroom. Prospect Heights, IL Waveland Press.


Clay, M., & Cazden, C. (1). A Vygotskian interpretation of reading recovery. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (pp. 06-). New York Cambridge University Press.


Costa, A. L. (11). The school as a home for the mind. Palatine, IL Skylight Publishing.


Christen, W. L., & Murphy, T. J. (11, March). Increasing comprehension by activating prior knowledge. Bloomington, IN ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 8885).


Delpit, L. D. (1, Autumn). Acquisition of literate discourse. Theory into Practice, 1(4), 6-0.


Eisner, E. W. (185). Creative education in American schools today. Educational Horizons, 6 (Special Issue), 10-15.


Galveston Bay On-Line Curriculum. Houston, TX Armadillo WWW Server.


Gardner, H. (18). Frames of mind The theory of multiple intelligences. New York Basic Books.


Gardner, H. (1). Multiple intelligences The theory in practice. New York Basic Books.


Garner the support and engagement of parents and community members. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Gay, G. (14, Summer). Coming of age ethnically Teaching young adolescents of color. Theory into Practice, (), 14-155.


Gay. G. NCREL monograph A synthesis of scholarship in multicultural education. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Goodman, Y. M., & Goodman, K. S. (10). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. -50). New York Cambridge University Press.


Harmin, M. (14). Inspiring active learning A handbook for teachers. Alexandria, VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Herman, G. N., & Hollingworth, P. (1). Kinetic kaleidoscope. Tucson, AZ Zephyr Press.


Kujawa, S., & Huske, L. (15). The Strategic Teaching and Reading Project guidebook (Rev. ed.). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Lazear, D. (11). Seven Ways of Teaching The Artistry of Teaching with Multiple Intelligences. Menlo Park, CA Addison Wesley.


Lee, C. D. (1, February). Literacy, cultural diversity, and instruction. Education and Urban Society, 4(), 7-1.


McCombs, B. L., King, J., & Wagner, E. ...And learning for all. Resource directory Model programs and practices transforming American education. Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory (McREL), Aurora, CO, and Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications -- Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO.


Neisser, U. (Ed.). (186). The school achievement of minority children New perspectives. Hillandale, NJ L. Erlbaum Associates.


Newman, D., Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (18). The construction zone Working for cognitive change in school. New York Cambridge University Press.


Ogle, D. S. (186). K-W-L group instructional strategy. In A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, B. F. Jones, & E. G. Carr (Eds.), Teaching reading as thinking (Teleconference Resource Guide, pp. 11-17). Alexandria, VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Paris, K. A. (14). A leadership model for planning and implementing change for school-to-work transition (pp. -5). Madison, WI University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on Education and Work.


Perkins, D. N. & Solomon, G. (188, September). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), -.


Perkins, D. N., & Solomon, G. (18, January-February). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-5.


Peshkin, A. (1). The relationship between culture and curriculum A many fitting thing. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook on research on curriculum (pp. 48-67). New York Macmillan.


Presseisen, B. Z. (11). Thinking skills Meanings and models revisited. In A.L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds A resource book for teaching thinking (rev. ed). Alexandria, VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Professional development. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Protheroe, N. J., & Barsdate, K. J. (1, March). Culturally sensitive instruction. Streamlined Seminar, 10(4), 1-4.


Quellmalz, E. S. (187). Developing reasoning skills. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills Theory and practice (pp. 86-105). New York W.H. Freeman.


Restructuring to promote learning in Americas schools, videoconference # The thinking curriculum. (10). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Restructuring to promote learning in Americas schools, videoconference # The collaborative classroom -- Reconnecting teachers and learners. (11). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Rosenshine, B. (17). Content, time and direct instruction. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching. Berkeley McCutchan.


Rosenshine, B. (18). Teaching functions in instructional programs. The Elementary School Journal, 8, 5-51.


Roth, R. Family Math. (14, November). In Best Practice 4. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Saks, J. (188). The effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on readers cognitive processing of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.


Sample Family Math problems. (14, November). In Best Practice 4. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Summary of Goals 000 Educate American Act. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Taylor, O. (188). Cross-cultural communication An essential dimension of effective education. Washington, DC Mid-Atlantic Center for Race Equity.


Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (188). Rousing minds to life Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context (p. 5). New York Cambridge University Press.


The new definition of learning The first step for school reform. Videoconference. (10). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Viadero, D. (14, February ). A world of difference. Education Week, 1(1), 4-6.


Vygotsky, L. S. (178). Mind in society The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.


Weade, G. (1). Locating learning in the times and spaces of teaching. In H. H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining student learning (pp. 87-118). Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing.


What does research say about assessment? Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


What is the collaborative classroom? Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Why should schools be learning communities? Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Willis, S. (1, November). Interdisciplinary learning. Curriculum Update.


Wood, D. (188). How children think and learn The social contexts of cognitive development. Cambridge, MA Basil Blackwell.


Au, K. H. (1). Changes in teachers view of interactive comprehension instruction. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education Instructional implications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 71-86). New York Cambridge University Press.


Beyer, B. K. (11). Teaching thinking skills A handbook for elementary school teachers. Boston Allyn and Bacon.


Boggs, S. T., Watson-Gegeo, K., & McMillen, G. (185). Speaking, relating, and learning A study of Hawaiian children at home and at school. Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing Group.


Bower, B., Lobdell, J., & Swenson, L. (14). A new approach to teaching history in the diverse classroom. Teaching Thinking and Problem-Solving, 16(1), 7-14.


Brualdi, A C. (16). Multiple intelligences Gardners theory. ERIC Digest [Online]. Available http//www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed4106.html


Cazden, C. B., John, V. P., & Hymes, D. H. (Eds.). (185). Functions of language in the classroom. Prospect Heights, IL Waveland Press.


Clay, M., & Cazden, C. (1). A Vygotskian interpretation of reading recovery. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (pp. 06-). New York Cambridge University Press.


Costa, A. L. (11). The school as a home for the mind. Palatine, IL Skylight Publishing.


Christen, W. L., & Murphy, T. J. (11, March). Increasing comprehension by activating prior knowledge. Bloomington, IN ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 8885).


Delpit, L. D. (1, Autumn). Acquisition of literate discourse. Theory into Practice, 1(4), 6-0.


Eisner, E. W. (185). Creative education in American schools today. Educational Horizons, 6 (Special Issue), 10-15.


Galveston Bay On-Line Curriculum. Houston, TX Armadillo WWW Server.


Gardner, H. (18). Frames of mind The theory of multiple intelligences. New York Basic Books.


Gardner, H. (1). Multiple intelligences The theory in practice. New York Basic Books.


Garner the support and engagement of parents and community members. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Gay, G. (14, Summer). Coming of age ethnically Teaching young adolescents of color. Theory into Practice, (), 14-155.


Gay. G. NCREL monograph A synthesis of scholarship in multicultural education. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Goodman, Y. M., & Goodman, K. S. (10). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. -50). New York Cambridge University Press.


Harmin, M. (14). Inspiring active learning A handbook for teachers. Alexandria, VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Herman, G. N., & Hollingworth, P. (1). Kinetic kaleidoscope. Tucson, AZ Zephyr Press.


Kujawa, S., & Huske, L. (15). The Strategic Teaching and Reading Project guidebook (Rev. ed.). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Lazear, D. (11). Seven Ways of Teaching The Artistry of Teaching with Multiple Intelligences. Menlo Park, CA Addison Wesley.


Lee, C. D. (1, February). Literacy, cultural diversity, and instruction. Education and Urban Society, 4(), 7-1.


McCombs, B. L., King, J., & Wagner, E. ...And learning for all. Resource directory Model programs and practices transforming American education. Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory (McREL), Aurora, CO, and Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications -- Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO.


Neisser, U. (Ed.). (186). The school achievement of minority children New perspectives. Hillandale, NJ L. Erlbaum Associates.


Newman, D., Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (18). The construction zone Working for cognitive change in school. New York Cambridge University Press.


Ogle, D. S. (186). K-W-L group instructional strategy. In A. S. Palincsar, D. S. Ogle, B. F. Jones, & E. G. Carr (Eds.), Teaching reading as thinking (Teleconference Resource Guide, pp. 11-17). Alexandria, VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Paris, K. A. (14). A leadership model for planning and implementing change for school-to-work transition (pp. -5). Madison, WI University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on Education and Work.


Perkins, D. N. & Solomon, G. (188, September). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1), -.


Perkins, D. N., & Solomon, G. (18, January-February). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-5.


Peshkin, A. (1). The relationship between culture and curriculum A many fitting thing. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook on research on curriculum (pp. 48-67). New York Macmillan.


Presseisen, B. Z. (11). Thinking skills Meanings and models revisited. In A.L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds A resource book for teaching thinking (rev. ed). Alexandria, VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.


Professional development. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Protheroe, N. J., & Barsdate, K. J. (1, March). Culturally sensitive instruction. Streamlined Seminar, 10(4), 1-4.


Quellmalz, E. S. (187). Developing reasoning skills. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills Theory and practice (pp. 86-105). New York W.H. Freeman.


Restructuring to promote learning in Americas schools, videoconference # The thinking curriculum. (10). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Restructuring to promote learning in Americas schools, videoconference # The collaborative classroom -- Reconnecting teachers and learners. (11). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Rosenshine, B. (17). Content, time and direct instruction. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching. Berkeley McCutchan.


Rosenshine, B. (18). Teaching functions in instructional programs. The Elementary School Journal, 8, 5-51.


Roth, R. Family Math. (14, November). In Best Practice 4. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Saks, J. (188). The effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on readers cognitive processing of text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.


Sample Family Math problems. (14, November). In Best Practice 4. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Summary of Goals 000 Educate American Act. Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Taylor, O. (188). Cross-cultural communication An essential dimension of effective education. Washington, DC Mid-Atlantic Center for Race Equity.


Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (188). Rousing minds to life Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context (p. 5). New York Cambridge University Press.


The new definition of learning The first step for school reform. Videoconference. (10). Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Viadero, D. (14, February ). A world of difference. Education Week, 1(1), 4-6.


Vygotsky, L. S. (178). Mind in society The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.


Weade, G. (1). Locating learning in the times and spaces of teaching. In H. H. Marshall (Ed.), Redefining student learning (pp. 87-118). Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing.


What does research say about assessment? Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


What is the collaborative classroom? Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Why should schools be learning communities? Oak Brook, IL North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.


Willis, S. (1, November). Interdisciplinary learning. Curriculum Update.


Wood, D. (188). How children think and learn The social contexts of cognitive development. Cambridge, MA Basil Blackwell.


Please note that this sample paper on Cultural Background is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Cultural Background, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Cultural Background will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Legalization of Prostitution

|

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Legalization of Prostitution. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Legalization of Prostitution paper right on time. Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Legalization of Prostitution, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Legalization of Prostitution paper at affordable prices!


Abstract


The legalization of prostitution, would not only help with medical issues, it would save money. It is said that prostitution causes inconvenience and troubles to general public. Does the general public have the right to live without prostitution, or do prostitutes have the right to make money. If prostitutions are located in some low-population-density areas, the harms or inconvenience caused by prostitutions will be smaller. The right to be a prostitute or the right to stop prostitution should be granted to general public. Is a legal prostitution system an impossibility because the rights are too difficult to be decided? Government regulations are the only ways to solve this problem. The government should evaluate the total benefits of each side before making any decision. Peoples minds are more and more open, and it is believed that the advanced technology will enhance the protections sexually transmitted diseases and the benefits monetarily by less law enforcement and taxation should also be considered. This is a very hard decision to make and will never satisfy everyone.


Legalization of Prostitution


One of the oldest legal debates comes from prostitution, there is no denying that the sex industry has taken international dimensions and is recognized as an economic motor for many countries. Prostitution defined as promiscuous and mercenary sexual behavior with emotional indifference between the partners. There isn't a more specific definition because people perceive it in different ways. Some view it as a dehumanizing act while others see it as an occupation that performs a useful service to society. Because people aren't always able to act out their sexual feelings how they want, prostitution allows them to express these desires. Most people think that the actual sex act is what is illegal. But it's actually the solicitation to perform that sex act for money or other valuables that is illegal. Prostitution is one of the oldest professions in the world and should be legalized in the United States like it has been in other countries.


As countries around the world discusses the merits of the legalization of prostitution. The following questions should be addressed. Would legalization reduce some of the inequalities and abuse suffered by the women involved? On the other hand, by legitimizing prostitution, would society reverse decades of work to promote human rights and improve the status of women? On the surface, this looks like a rehashing of a timeless debate. However, it is not. The question is no longer about morality is prostitution a vice and are those involved evil or somehow lacking in judgment? There are many reasons why prostitution is illegal in 4 U.S. states today. First, and foremost, many people feel that prostitution should stay illegal in order to preserve morality. Parents do not want their children to grow up thinking that prostitution is acceptable. Worse yet, parents do not want to hear their children say, When I grow up, I want to be a prostitute. Christianity also looks down upon prostitution because according to their beliefs, the act of sex is only to be done when a man and a woman are in love and married. Monogamy is to be practiced in the marriage, and any violation of this is considered a sin. Another reason why the preservation of morality is so important is that peoples morals shape the future of our nation. Many people feel that if prostitution is legalized, then its long term effects would be detrimental to the United States. The divorce rate in the United States peaked at an all time high in 180 (Institute for First Amendment Studies [IFAS], 16, Page 1). By the legalization of prostitution, this would allow room for husbands and wives to commit adultery. Thus, leading the marriage to a divorce. The divorce rate has really increased over the centuries. In the U.S. today, the divorce rate is fifty percent of the U.S. itself (Holland, 18, p.1).


It is said that prostitution causes inconvenience and troubles to general public. Does the general public have the right to live without prostitution nearby, which will prevent prostitutes from making money, or do prostitutes have the right to make money, which will prevent the general public from living in a more enjoyable environment? The right to be a prostitute or the right to stop prostitution should be granted to general public. However, it is very difficult to decide such rights. What should be considered as prostitutions? If a female who provides a male with sex service for returns is said to be a prostitute, then is a wife who provide sex service for her husband for his love said to be a prostitute? Is having sex before marriage called prostitution? We can see that it is very costly to decide such rights.


Now the question should be asked is prostitution a form of exploitation to be abolished or an occupation to be regulated? By decriminalizing prostitution, laws would protect prostitutes, enable prostitutes to prosecute for abuses, and finally, health concerns would be regulated. For decades, scholars have speculated why women would go freely into prostitution. There is a large difference in the education level among prostitutes. The average is sixth grade for streetwalkers; ninth grade for dancers/ prostitutes, the mean grade completed is ninth. (Usry, 1, p.85) Latent lesbianism, low intelligence, a home life of abuse, and desperate poverty head the list of possible reasons. Nevertheless, no one has been able to isolate a specific set of social factors that leads to prostitution. If in fact, prostitution is looked upon as another occupation, then why not create a win-win situation. Prostitutes would contribute monetarily to society and would have in return rights to health benefits and retirement would be ensured. According to the "World Charter for Prostitutes' Rights," prostitutes themselves believe that they should "pay regular taxes on the same basis as other independent contractors and employees, and should receive the same benefits." As well as being able to contribute to society, prostitutes will be safer under the umbrella of the law.(International Committee for Prostitutes Rights [ICPR], 000, p.40) One argument against prostitution is that women and children are forced into the sex trade. Although this can be true, especially in Asia and other third world countries, it should be noted, however, that most prostitutes do not consider themselves to be victims and claim to freely choose prostitution as their occupation.


One prostitute, in the book Vindication of the Rights of Whores insists, "They get hysterical about us! I am tired of all these people who lie all the time. It is not right to call prostitution a threat to humanity. It is ridiculous to mix up child prostitution, and slavery, and exploitation with us I am a free and conscious adult" (Pheterson, 18, p. 14). Serious crimes, such as child prostitution, are harder to monitor in the general climate of criminality. If an industry is unregulated and criminalized then it's going to be run by criminals. Legalization of prostitution will bring more safety, legitimacy and autonomy to the industry as a whole. Laws would distinguish between voluntary and forced prostitution. The pimp or brothel owner would be open to prosecution for abuses. Examples of violence, from the book A Vindication of Rights of Whores, tell of police providing no protection to prostitutes. Even when reports came to the police in Sydney, Australia, of "women being lassoed and dragged behind a car," and of women disappearing, police did nothing (Pheterson, 18, p.60). When these men finally killed a nurse who was an ex-beauty queen, the men were arrested in a matter of days. When prostitutes saw the three men accused in the paper, the women said "That's the guy, those are the men who have been committing violence against us" (Pheterson, 18, p.10). The Australian Prostitutes' Collective went to police and told them these men were responsible for the violence against them in the last few months. The attitude from the police was "Look, if these women weren't here in the first place, this sort of thing wouldn't happen" (Pheterson, 18, p.15) It is easy to see the contrast between the attitude of the police toward violence on all the street women and the murder of the one single woman. In a matter of days, after the murder of a beauty queen, the police had three men in custody.


There is a good deal of evidence to show that the amount of victimization prostitutes experience in the course of their work is very high. For example, according to The International Handbook on Trends, Problems and Policies, "Mimi Silbert's survey of 00 prostitutes in the San Francisco area indicates 70 percent of her sample were victimized by customers" who raped them or who went beyond the work contract. The majority of women have been victims of robbery, physical and verbal violence, and theft of service; "two�thirds of them claimed to have been beaten regularly by their pimps". "Seventy-eight percent reported being victimized by perversion an average of seventeen times each" (Davis, 1, p.0). Prostitutes can also be abused in similar ways by police officers and other officers of the court. In all these cases, prostitutes find it almost impossible to press their cases because of their vulnerability to prosecution and because of their lack of resources. If they do press their case, it is doubtful that they will be believed. For instance, it is often said a prostitute cannot be raped. Legalization would also allow officials to give up the farce of upholding anti-prostitution laws. According to a counsel person in New York, quoted in Whores in History Prostitution in Western Society, "the actual situation in this city is that prostitution is accepted by everyone police, judges, clerks, and lawyers. Arrest and prosecution are purely gestures that have to be made to keep up the façade of public morality" (Roberts, 1, p. 1). The first prostitute in the United States to speak publicly for rights of sex workers, Margo St James, states in A Vindication of the Rights of Whores, "By legalizing pornography and keeping prostitution illegal, the government legitimizes white men selling women's sexuality while criminalizing women for selling sex on their own terms" (Pheterson, 18, p. 5). Except for a few counties in Nevada, prostitution is illegal in the United States. However, there is a growing movement across the country to bring to this old profession certain rights and privileges that are already afforded the rest of the country. Following in the steps of Margo St James, a Palm Beach county woman is launching her own such crusade challenging the constitutionality of Florida's laws against prostitution. The woman, whose identity is confidential, is trying to follow in the path of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. "Government just has to get out of the bedroom," says Jane Roe II. She continues, "If Roe v. Wade gave women the right to privacy and the right to do with her body as she chooses, why isn't prostitution legal?" (Decker, 15, p.). Of course, this is a sensitive issue with the feminists in Florida sharply divided.


"Prostitution, whether by choice or not degrades women," says Shena Moss, president of the South Florida chapter of the National Organization for Women (Decker, 15, p. 4). However, Siobhan McLaughlin, the Florida State Director of NOW, supports Jane Roe II's arguments. In the same article, "Ex-Call Girl Tries to Legalize Prostitution" in the Christian Science Monitor, Ms.McLaughlin says, "Certainly if a woman decides on this career of engaging in the sex industry, that is essentially her business. If she's not being coerced, and if she has other options, then maybe in some ways she does find that empowering" (Decker, 15, p. 4). In fact, empowerment of prostitutes holds the greatest promise of the prevention of the spread of AIDS and venereal diseases. From the health point of view, it is surely self-evident that an open and above-board sex industry, in which workers are not stigmatized and outlawed, would be to the benefit of all concerned, prostitutes and clients alike. The state could and should provide health facilities for sex workers. Health advocates, quoted in Politics of Prostitution, argue that legalization allows prostitutes to work without fear and implement safety measures. Prostitution is a great health risk to the U.S. because of the spread of sexually transmitted diseases (STD's). The U.S. Department of Health reports that -5% of the sexually transmitted disease in this country is related to prostitution. There are no statistics in the U.S. that prostitutes are vectors of the HIV virus. A small percentage of prostitutes may have HIV but there are no proven cases that a prostitute transferred this disease to one of there clients. (Lambert, 188) A major concern about STD's is the spread of AIDS, which is currently a deadly STD because a cure has not yet been found for the disease. The transmission of STD's is already on the rise due to many uneducated teenagers having unprotected sex. In addition, most of theses teens are not going to a physician to be screened for them. Because of this, many curable STD's are going untreated and being spread throughout a community. Prostitution only adds to this problem because prostitutes have sexual contact on a daily basis, and rarely have themselves screened for STD's. Most of the time, prostitutes will not go to a doctor because they cannot afford it, they are too afraid, and/or they just do not want to deal with it. Unfortunately, simply ignoring the problem does not make it go away. Studies have shown that since the requirement for legal prostitutes in Nevada to use condoms, the cases of venereal disease have dramatically decreased to the point of being nearly nonexistent (Bastedo, 1). In Nevada, prostitutes are required to register with the state. These prostitutes are required to appear twice a week at a special clinic to be examined for venereal diseases. This health supervision and care of prostitutes, including hospitalization when necessary, is borne entirely by the state. Although some rules the prostitutes have to endure are excessive, such as not being able to go into town during the week and not being allowed to have relationships with anyone outside of the brothel, Nevada has managed to control the prostitution issue (Bastedo, 1).


With prostitution being illegal, many violent crimes against prostitutes go unreported every year. Prostitutes are often too frightened to report the crime to police. Most of the time, the crimes perpetuator is a pimp or a client. Several of the crimes committed against prostitutes include robbery, kidnapping, rape, battery, and/or homicide. The current system, where prostitution is repressed but not substantially punished, is clearly not working. ). Many citizens feel that police efforts should be directed towards more serious crimes, such as drug trafficking. With the cost of court fees, enforcement, and jail housing for the convicted prostitutes, some citizens are beginning to wonder if the government is approaching the problem correctly. "The average arrest, court and incarceration costs amount to nearly $000.00 per arrest. Cities spend an average of 7.5 million dollars on prostitution control every year, ranging from 1 million dollars (Memphis) to million dollars (New York)" (Pearl, 187 p. 76). Society should learn from other countries that have decriminalized adult sex work, yet resist street prostitution. Another benefit of legal prostitution is the reduction of violent crimes. Almost all brothels located in Nevada provide security for their workers. This creates a safe working environment for the prostitutes. Crimes against prostitutes such as robbery, kidnapping, rape, battery, and/or homicide are greatly reduced. Security is not only for the prostitutes, but it is also for the customers. This decreases the chances of prostitutes rolling their clients. Other countries, such as Germany, have shown that decriminalization and even legitimized prostitution can work under specific circumstances. State regulation has reduced prostitution-related crime and venereal diseases, and it has even increased state revenues, as prostitutes and brothels have to pay income taxes. If prostitutes were to be taxed like any other place of business, millions of extra revenue dollars would become available to the government, for it to spend as it sees fit. Although the monetary concerns are overwhelming one of the most debated issues is the health and safety of prostitution. Government regulation would also mean the elimination of pimps. Street prostitutes are normally controlled by a pimp, who usually keeps the prostitute dependent on drugs so that he or she can control the amount of money that the prostitute makes. While many critics may maintain that prostitution is immoral and unethical, the issue cannot be denied. Prostitution happens all over the world and in most cities. A great deal of money and time is spent attempting to stop illegal prostitution. When a prostitute is picked up by the police, she or he usually spends a night in jail, goes to court, pays a fine, serves a short time in jail and/or completes community service. Then, the prostitute is released and is back on the streets in no time. If prostitution were to be decriminalized, the profession of prostitution could become a healthy, publicly sanctioned place of business.


An experiment of decriminalization is worth the risk, however regulation would be necessary. It is important to stress that prostitution legislation reform needs to go hand and hand with other social policy reforms, including the female poverty problem and child welfare. Unfortunately, the fact remains that a politician's support for the decriminalization of prostitution would be political suicide. Public opinion does not bode well for any politician who is perceived to be soft on crime, much less someone that is a supporter of prostitution. One can only hope that political courage and public education will allow reform to occur. The benefits to both the prostitute and society are hard to ignore. By the decriminalization of prostitution, the life of sex workers will be greatly improved because legal workers are more able to resist exploitation and to report offenses committed against them. They will be able to access health, welfare and legal resources. Society will have greater say in their health habits and regulation will be possible. Society as a whole will be safer, just as a restaurant will lose its reputation and eventually its license if the food isn't fresh and health codes aren't met so will the free market regulate health standards of working women. Prostitution cannot be judged using preconceived notions, but rather by viewing all of the facts and determining logistically whether or not prostitutes are receiving lawful treatment. The answer to this question is that they are not. Prostitution in the 0th century in Western society is an illegal act which if were to be legalized would profit and preserve not only the prostitutes but society as a whole. Legalizing prostitution is economically profitable for governments in dire need of resources. The anti-prostitution laws which are intended to help the prostitutes and society, instead force prostitution underground and without these laws prostitution could become a clean and safe occupation. Present day prostitution laws are unconstitutional and should be abolished because of their unconstitutional nature. Prostitution and prostitutes are issues that few individuals have taken the time to fully understand, and so the issues are misunderstood and their voices go unheard. Some issues, like prostitution, have been around for thousands of years and will never go away.


Nowadays, peoples minds are more and more open, and it is believed that the advanced technology will enhance the protections against AIDS and other diseases and with the possible savings from law enforcement the consideration of decriminalization of prostitution begins to seem possible. Prostitution is an issue which has caused controversy cross-culturally and historically and which has many individuals reexamining the logistics of it. If prostitution is decriminalized it will become economically profitable and feasible for not only the prostitutes, but also western society as a whole. Without the 0th century western laws, which force prostitution underground, the profession of prostitution could become a clean and safe occupation. Prostitution is one of the oldest professions in the world and should be legalized in the United States like it has been in other countries.


Reference


Bastedo, M. (1, May 1). The politics of prostitution. www.toptown.com. Retrieved April 0, 00, from the World Wide Web http//www.toptown.com/hp/MIKEYB/prosfem.htm


Committee for Prostitutes Rights (000, January 5;). World Charter for Prostitutes Rights. www.walnet.org. Retrieved April , 00 from the World Wide Web http//www.walnet.org/csis/groups/icpr_charter.html


Davis, N. J. (1). Prostitution An International Handbook Trends, Problems, and Policies. Westport, CT Greenwood Press.


Decker, J. P. (15). Ex-call girl tries to legalize prostitution. Christian Science Monitor, 6, p. .


Holland, B. (18, March). The Long Good-Bye. Smithsonian Magazine, 86, p.1. www.smithsonianmag.si.edu. Retrieved April 5, 00 from the World Wide Web http//www.smithsonianmag.si.edu/smithsonian/issues8/mar8/divorce.html


Institute for First Amendment Studies (16, July 16). National divorce statistics. www.ifas.org. Retrieved April 6,00 from the World Wide Web http//www.ifas.org/fw/607/statistics.html


Lambert, B. (188, September 0). AIDS in Prostitutes, Not as Prevalent as Believed. New York Times, , pp. 7, , 17.


Pearl, J. (187, April). The Highest Paying Customers. Hastings Law Journal, , p. 76.


Pheterson, G. (18). A Vindication of the Rights of Whores (1st ed.). Seattle, WA The Seal Press.


Roberts, N. (1). Prostitution in Western London. London, England HarperCollins.


Usry, B. (1). Sisterhood of the Night (5th ed.). Far Hills, NJ New Horizon Press.


Please note that this sample paper on Legalization of Prostitution is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Legalization of Prostitution, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Legalization of Prostitution will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning

|

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning paper right on time. Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning paper at affordable prices with cheap essay writing service!


Human cloning becomes more and more controversial now that the scientists are technologically ready to undertake this revolutionary step in human reproduction. There are many proponents of human cloning who find justifying arguments. They argue that cloning would alleviate trauma and grief for people who lost someone close in an accident because a "replacement" could be created. Further, infertile couples could use cloning techniques to have children. Next, human cloning would terminate genetic faults in people. Additionally, people who want an image of them to live on forever could preserve their life in clones of themselves. Human cloning in general would contribute to research and experiments on human body and scientific limits. Cloning could also become a new source of economic activity. The arguments to the contrary include equally strong ideas. First, cloning humans is ethically questionable because it may have unpredictable social and psychological consequences. Second, a cloned individual would be genetically identical to the cloned individual, but she/he would not be the same as the cloned individual to replace her/him. Moreover, cloning is illegal in the US. The opponents of human cloning insist that no scientist should do everything she/he CAN do. There are certain ethical boundaries for scientists to abide by. They should not do things to harm other people in any way especially that scientists' knowledge and abilities could be dangerous to human race. A situation who-CAN-do-what could create an unhealthy competition among the scientists, who would care more about their personal benefit and fame than about the benefit of humanity. In the light of controversy on human cloning, past and current findings in this field elicit many ethical questions for future research.


The idea of human cloning takes its beginnings from animal cloning. The procedure of cloning is wildly understood as extracting a nucleus from one cell and implanting it into another cell, for example, egg cell. This process would create offspring identical to the donor of the nucleus because DNA genetic encoding is wired into the nucleus of a cell. The procedure is so universal that it can be applied to any cells regardless of their complexity. Thus, although cloning was originally utilized for cloning simple organisms, now, it can be applied to duplicating human cells as well. The cloning history started in the middle of twentieth century with cloning fairly uncomplicated creatures like frogs; and from there it spread to other species, including human cells.


The cloning takes its roots in 150s, when the first formal frog clones were created by Doctors Robert Briggs and Thomas J. King at the Institute for Cancer Research in Philadelphia (Stalzer). The next successfully cloned frogs came to being in England in 170s (Evans). At that time, the scientific achievement sparked some ethical concern, but cloning frogs was so much simpler than cloning mammals that nobody believed then that cloning mammals would ever be possible. Although the trial studies on cloning frogs expanded greatly to the other species and more complex organisms, scientists still believe that the technique used to create the frogs could be adapted to grow more complicated organisms and human organs such as hearts, kidneys, and liver.


Cheap University Papers on Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning


The research continued, and in 16, a great achievement was accomplished; the first successful mammal clone, Dolly the sheep, came into being. The achievement was considered the most significant thus far. In 16, Ian Wilmut and his colleagues "extracted the nucleus of a cell just like the [other scientists before them], but his success stemmed from his treatment of the cell after it was removed. He placed the cell into a solution (which barely kept it alive), and allowed the cell to virtually 'shut down' and reprogram itself" (Stalzer). The scientists were unable to explain why this procedure worked better than the other ones, and why this attempt was successful. All in all, a new live sheep was created. The cloning research was continued; and it was approaching humans even faster.


In March 000, iwon.com published news provided by Reuters about the first successful pig cloning. The news announced that PPL Therapeutics Plc, the British biopharmaceutical company that helped to clone Dolly the sheep, has created the worlds first five cloned pigs named Millie, Christa, Alexis, Carrel and Dotcom. The pig cloning has been perceived as a new opportunity to establish a great source of organ transplants for humans, known as "xenotransplantation" (Reaney). Pigs which have organs of similar size to human organs can be grown very quickly, so if genetic engineering solves the transplant rejection problem, pigs could bring hope to "68,000 people in the United States and 50,000 in Europe who are waiting for livers, kidney and hearts. The lists increase by 15 percent a year, while the number of organ donors are dwindling" (Reaney).


The success of animal cloning in the past is believed to contribute to progress in human cloning in spite of the fact that the current trials of creating people do not seem to be successful. There are private groups of scientists, for example, a private consortium of scientists founded by an Italian physician, Dr Severino Antinori of University of Kentucky, who told BBC News Online It would be wholly irresponsible to try to clone a human being, given the present state of the technology…The success rate with animal cloning is about one to two percent in the published results, and I think lower than that on average. I dont know anyone working in this area who thinks the rate will easily be improved" (Kirby). The main problem in achieving a success is keeping the offspring alive in late pregnancy and right after birth. On one hand, Dr. Antinori underlines that the chances of successful human cloning are very slight and risks are very high; on the other hand, he promises that the first human clone will be possible as early as 005. To clone a human being, the scientists would use the same technique they used for cloning Dolly the sheep, which took 77 attempts (Kirby). Due to possible abuses, the technological advancement and the relatively close probability of creating a human clone have started a startling worldwide controversy.


Creating humans out of a single cell raises some ethical concerns in many countries. Because human cloning may lead to abuses and undesirable moral, social, and psychological consequences, different countries adapt contradicting policies. Some nations think that the advantages of cloning offset the possible disadvantages. Still, other groups definitely are against this way of reproduction since it would impose oddities humans never dealt with before.


The foremost concerns regarding artificial creating human embryos are probable abuses of the technique and its product. The moral consequences could lead to diminishing the worth of human life. If one could be simply cloned in case of his/her death, individuals would no longer be perceived as unique and irreplaceable. Thus, "cloning jeopardizes the personal identity and autonomy of the clone because a cloned child is deliberately deprived of a 'normal social identity,'… and cloning turns humans into commodities and artifacts, thereby demonstrating callousness toward, and depersonalization of, human life" (Post). Another serious danger is seen in social implications human cloning may have. Simply, undesirable groups of society would be eliminated through deliberate breeding of only chosen qualities and individuals. "The process of cloning would necessarily increase conformity and eradicate genetic variety" (Post). In multicultural nations like the United States, such process of perfecting the social qualities through cloning would produce dangerous social tensions between diverse ethnical groups. In addition to the moral and social effects, there would also arise negative psychological effects. Doctor Patricia A. Baird of University of British Columbia thinks that possible psychological harms to cloned individuals include diminished individuality, a sense of foreclosed future, or a disturbed sense of identity


"An important part of human identity is the sense of arising from a maternal and a paternal line while at the same time being a unique individual. Many children who are adopted, or conceived from donor insemination, show a deep need to learn about their biological origins. Making children by cloning means that they do not have this dual genetic origin; they are not connected to others in the same biological way as the rest of humanity. The first person born this way would have to cope with being the first not to come from the union of egg and sperm. Social, family, and kinship relationships that support human flourishing have evolved over millennia but there is no way to place replicants. Is the DNA source the twin? The mother? The father?" (Baird)


Due to the various and fully unpredictable social, psychological, and moral disadvantages human cloning may impose onto the cloned individuals as well as the societies, countries around the globe dispute policies they should adopt to manage the issue effectively and justly. In the United States, public polls show overwhelming opposition to human cloning. In June 17, President Clinton ordered the National Bioethics Advisory Commission consisting of eighteen members to prepare a report on the ethics of human cloning research. In the report, the commission concluded that human cloning was ethically unacceptable at that time and suggested banning cloning of humans. As a result of this report, legislative bills were presented to the House of Representatives and the Senate making it illegal "for any person to use a human somatic cell for the process of producing a human clone" (Kass and Wilson). Several other countries like France, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, Spain, and other nations support the US policies against human embryo cloning. Some European countries including United Kingdom, Belgium, and Russia, however, allow highly regulated embryo research. In the UK, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act of 10 prohibits the transplant of nuclei into embryos, but it does not prohibit transferring the nuclei into eggs, as it was done in cloning Dolly the sheep, and as it is to be done to clone humans. (Post). The support of human cloning is not as much direct and intended as coming from existing loopholes allowing for scientific manipulation.


The future of human cloning is difficult to predict because arising concerns build rather unfavorable atmosphere for future research. The conflict between proponents and opponents of this way of human reproduction may shift the public opinion and legislation in a new direction relatively soon. Undoubtedly, the arguments for cloning of humans seem to have some merit. Cloning in general have brought multiple advantages in food production, medicine, and genetics. Human cloning is argued to allow infertile couples or couples with genetic defects to have healthy children of their own. Further, the technique would enable scientists to produce organs for transplants, which due to the genetic similarity would not have the risk of being refused by the organism. And finally, human cloning could help people bring to life historically significant figures like Marilyn Monroe, George Washington, or Isaac Newton. As identical twins of the famous individuals, the cloned persons could have certain traits benefiting humanity (Stalzer).


Ethical aspects of the matter may, nonetheless, slow down the scientific research for many years to come. The lawmakers are considering cloning of human cells from different perspectives to analyze all possible options. Although they are prone to allow adult stem cell cloning meant to produce organs, they are pushed away by the public from human cloning destined to produce people. While growing adult cells into a limited number of cells is ethically acceptable for most people, it is the least desirable way of proceeding with the research for scientists because adult stem cells are not as flexible as embryonic cells. Although scientists would prefer to work on human embryos, this is viewed as ethically unacceptable by those who believe that human life begins at conception, traditionally - the union of the sperm and egg, in cloning - by implanting a nucleus of one cell into another cell (Gibbs 0). There is yet another possibility; researchers at Advanced Cell Technology in Massachusetts predict "that within 15 years, scientists will be able to reprogram human cells without having to rely on human eggs and embryos at all. They call it cellular DNA remodeling" (Gibbs1). Scientists argue that they will be able to achieve this technique only if they are allowed to work on human embryos, which are the fastest way to progress the DNA remodeling studies. Still, they do not state that this is the only way to study human DNA and cell development.


Human cloning is a relatively new field of bioethics and genetic research. The field shows a promising potential for all human imperfections caused by DNA abnormalities. Despite many promises, human cloning triggers many ethical and moral questions because one of the techniques requires creating human embryos later destroyed to provide cells used for the research. The public and pro-life lawmakers are firmly against this research tactic. Still, another cloning procedure allows using adult stem cells to grow organs; it is not as easy as utilizing embryo cells, but it is possible to work with. While, generally, working with adult stem cells is acceptable and desirable if it actually hopes to bring medical benefits for many patients, cloning humans in order to reproduce the same individual over and over again seems to be inappropriate. Although "twins and even triplets have been around for millenniums, engineering multiple copies of an adult or a lost child is just too creepy" (Gibbs).


Works Cited


Baird, Patricia A. MD. "Should Human Cloning Be Permitted?" Annales Apr. 00. 7 Apr. 00


Burley, Justine. The Genetic Revolution and Human Rights. Oxford Oxford University Press, 1. netLibrary. 1. May 00 http//www.emedia.netlibrary.com/reader/reader.asp?product_id=75087.


Evans, John H. "Cloning Adam's Rib A Primer on Religious Responses to Cloning." The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life 15 May 00. The Institute for Advance Study in Princeton http//pewforum.org/projects/bioethics/.


Frist, Bill. "Not Ready for Human Cloning." Washington Post 11 Apr. 00. 6 Apr. 00 http//www.washingtonpost.com/ac/wp-dyn?pagename=article=00Apr11.


Gibbs, Nancy. "Cloning Where Do You Draw the Line?" Time 1 Aug. 001 18-1.


Kass, Leon, and James Wilson. The Ethics of Human Cloning. Washington, D.C., AEI 18. Apr. 00 http//www.aei.org/shopl/shops/1/4050-0.pdf.


Kirby, Alex. "Cloned Human Planned by 00." BBC News 0 Jan. 001 http//news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1144000/114464.stm.


Post, May Mon."Human Cloning New Hope, New Implications, New Challenges." Temple International and Comparative Law Journal Spring 001 171-. OCLC FirstSearch. 0 May 00 http//newfirstsearch.oclc.org.


Reaney, Patricia. "Firm Says It Creates First Cloned Pigs." iWon.com 14 Mar. 00. 5 May 00 http//www.stedwards.edu/newc/capstone/sp000/biotechnology/iwon.htm.


Smith, Simon. "All the Reasons to Clone Human Beings." 6 Nov. 001. 0 Apr. 00 http//www.humancloning.org/allthe.htm.


Stalzer, Eric. "Human Cloning How Far Should We Go?" Technology and Culture PL1 0 Apr. 18. Loyola College. 0 May 00 http//www.loyola.edu/dept/philosophy/techne/cloning.htm.


Please note that this sample paper on Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Ethical Concerns of Human Cloning will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment from cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!